First published: Oct 2024
‘Death Of Lessee’ Provision Pitfalls
TAKEAWAY The central legal issue here is over the meaning of a lease provision known as the “Death of Lessee” provision. The Death of Lessee provision in this proprietary lease is a typical variant that provides that if a shareholder dies, “consent shall not be unreasonably withheld to an assignment of the lease and shares to a financially responsible member of the Lessee’s family.” There are several potential interpretative pitfalls in this provision, two of which are at issue in this case. First, what is the meaning of the phrase “member of the Lessee’s family”? Does a niece qualify? Complicating matters is that, while “family member” is not defined here, a different provision of this co-op’s proprietary lease limited use of the apartment to shareholders and their “children, grandchildren, parents, grandparents, brothers and sisters.” Does the fact that this other provision does not include nieces mean that “member of Lessee’s family” should also be read to not include nieces? Or does the fact that the Death of Lessee provision not specifically list immediate family members imply an intent to read “family member” more broadly? Second, the parties disagreed over what it means for the co-op to “not unreasonably withhold” consent. According to the co-op, this means nothing more than it could not act unreasonably in denying consent. In this case, the co-op contended that Stauber had engaged in a “pattern of disruptive behavior” and showed “an utter lack of judgment and inability to get along with others,” which provided a basis for rejecting her application. According to Stauber, however, the reasonableness standard must be confined to the elements specifically identified in the text of the provision – whether she is “financially responsible” and whether she is a “member of the Lessee’s family.” Thus, in Stauber’s view, the alleged behavior identified by the co-op is legally irrelevant because it has nothing to do with whether she is a financially responsible member of Cohen’s family. By denying summary judgment in favor of additional discovery, the court deferred resolving these ambiguities. For co-op boards looking to avoid these problems in the first place, the lesson here may be to consider amending your “Death of Lessee” provision to resolve these two potential sources of conflict.
STAUBER V. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF 8 E. 96TH ST., INC.
WHAT HAPPENED Martin Cohen and Lynne Levine were married in 1987 and divorced in 2010. Levine moved out of the co-op apartment they owned together, but remained an owner of the apartment as tenants in common. Cohen became ill and died in 2018. Elizabeth Stauber, Cohen’s niece and only living relative, was appointed the executor of his estate and sought to have his interest in the apartment transferred to her (having previously agreed with Levine to have Levine’s interest transferred to her). The co-op refused to approve the transfer based on Stauber’s personal history with the co-op, which included, in the last few weeks before Cohen passed, “a pattern of disruptive behavior” each time she came to the apartment. Stauber sued the co-op to try to force the co-op to recognize her right to own the apartment.
IN COURT After the co-op answered the complaint, but before discovery had been completed, Stauber filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that there were no issues of material fact in dispute preventing her from prevailing on her legal argument that she was the rightful owner of the apartment. The co-op argued, among other things, that the motion was premature, as the co-op had not been given an opportunity to depose Stauber about the co-op’s position that its rejection of her was “reasonable.” The court agreed and denied Stauber’s summary judgment motion, holding that the co-op “must be afforded the opportunity to collect testimony and other evidence to support its position that the board acted reasonably in denying plaintiff’s application.”
COUNSEL for the co-op board, Brett Gossett BOYD RICHARDS PARKER & COLONNELLI; for Elizabeth Stauber, Eni Mihilli and Jeffrey Eilender SCHLAM STONE & DOLAN; Justice Paul A. Goetz